2396 WORDS
Read the full essay 2396 words

Lectures: 17.04.03
Lecture One
Theoretical perspectives: early beginnings to present day
Lecture Two
Feminist challenges to youth and trouble: focus on teenage pregnancy and crime
The academic literature on `delinquent youth arises in part from official concern over young peoples activities outside direct adult supervision by parents, teachers or employers.
Griffin, C. (1993) Representations of Youth: The Study of
Adolescence in Britain and America, Cambridge: Polity
A set of concerns about the activities of young people and their supervision by
institutions or individuals representing the social order.
Johnston, L. (1993:96) The Modern Girl: Girlhood and Growing Up, Sydney: Allen & Unwin
Youth and trouble: theoretical perspectives
Biological determinism
Psychological theories
Sociological theories
Blumers symbolic interactionism rests on three premises:
humans act towards things on the basis of meanings that the things have for them
the meaning of things is derived from, or arises out of, the social interaction that one has with ones fellows
these meanings are handled in and modified through an interpretative process used by the person in dealing with the things he encounters.
Hester & Eglin, 1992.
In relation to criminal behaviour, symbolic interactionists concentrate on processes of social interaction in which:
certain behaviour is prohibited by law, i.e. the process of crime definition through legislation
certain acts and persons become subject to law enforcement, i.e. the process of crime selection by the police
certain acts and persons become fitted with the label `criminal i.e. the process of crime interpretation by the courts
criminal identity is developed, maintained and transformed (e.g.notion of careers).
Labelling theorists interpret deviance not as a set of characteristics of individuals or groups, but as a process of interaction between deviants and non-deviants.
Giddens, 1997: 178
Deviance is not the quality of the act a person commits but rather a consequence of the application by others of rules and sanctions to an offender. The deviant is one to whom that label has successfully been applied; deviant behaviour is behaviour that people so label.
Becker, 1963:9
Critique of labelling theory
Some acts are intrinsically wrong, such as murder.
There are differences e.g. people from a deprived background may shoplift more than rich people; although deviant behaviour may increase after conviction, there may be other prior explanations for this.
Labelling theory did not fully explain how what came to be seen as deviant was defined  the questions whose definitions, whose interests and why were not explored.
Mainstream vs radical
The mainstream perspective is positivist, empiricist and conservative, presenting itself as an apolitical and objective project. It is characterized by the tendency to investigate young people as both the source and the victims of a series of `social problems, adopting the victim-blaming thesis in the search for the cause(s) of specific phenomena. The radical perspective has been more likely to adopt structuralist and post-structuralist analyses, and to de-construct the association between young people and `social problems, asking different questions and viewing research as part of a consciously political project

Feminist challenge to the sociology of youth
Teenage pregnancy: a social problem or not?
Crime and invisible girls
While we were doing the research I was asked hundreds of times what my research was about (as researchers usually are). Almost invariably the response to my explanation was in the nature of `How awful! `Poor/Silly girls! Or `I bet you find some problems there! As the research neared its end I began to reply that actually te women and children were mostly doing fine, that lack of money was their major problem and that given their educational and family background it did not appear that their financial circumstances would necessarily have improved if they had deferred motherhood beyond their teenage years. Many people either simply did not believe me or added `Yes, but caveats to my account. Other people were astonished that the stories `young mothers might have to tell would not simply be full of doom and gloom
Phoenix, A. (1991:1) Young Mothers, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Reasons Phoenix asserts that there is a perception that young motherhood and poor outcomes for the child are linked:
Ambiguity of adolescents status.
Perceived to be most common among
groups which are seen to be
Reflects reality i.e. outcomes are
poor (Phoenix argues this is not the
Phoenix, A. (1991:1) Young Mothers, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Contribution of feminist critiques
Made girls and women visible.
Challenged theories which do